On November 6, Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse of the Northern District of California granted in part and denied in part Anthropic's motion to dismiss Kahn v. Anthropic PBC (No. 26-cv-05763-AGT). Plaintiffs Karl Kahn and Solomon Smith, Claude Max subscribers suing for a putative class, say the claim of "5x or 20x more usage than Pro" misleads buyers. The complaint prices Pro at $17 to $20 a month, Max 5x at $100 and Max 20x at $200. The court took the allegations as true and found the advertising plausibly misleading. With monthly billing, a reasonable consumer could read the claim as per month, while Max gives that multiple per five-hour session and weekly limits are not 5x or 20x higher. The complaint's calculation, recited by the court, is 3.5x for Max 5x and 6x for Max 20x on weekly Sonnet 4 usage. The disclosure did not end the case. The per-session explanation sat two hyperlinks from the sales pages, and an asterisk reading "Usage limits apply" did not mention sessions. Smith's Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) claim, negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract survive. Kahn's CLRA claim, the unfair-competition and false-advertising claims, and an implied-covenant claim were dismissed with leave to amend. An amended complaint is due December 2; otherwise Anthropic answers by December 16. Plans sold as "Nx more usage" can leave the unit unclear. The court read the claim as monthly because the plan bills monthly, and it declined to rely on a limit explained two clicks away. That is a pleading-stage view, not a finding that Anthropic misled anyone, and the order does not cover business plans. The order also notes that the contract reserved Anthropic's right to change capacity limits, one reason the claim about mid-cycle tightening was dismissed. For a company standardizing on a paid AI plan, the practical point is the plan's own definition of usage. Ask for the per-session, weekly and monthly limits in writing, and log a month of real consumption before budgeting for a team. Get each AI plan's session, weekly and monthly limits in writing before you standardize on it. Order on Motion to Dismiss, Kahn v. Anthropic PBC: The court's order of November 6: the reasonable-consumer analysis, the disclosure discussion, which claims were dismissed or kept, and the December 2 and December 16 deadlines. This is Courthouse News's copy; no court docket link was verified.